Reliability in pore pressure measurements
/Could someone suggest any articles and/or book about reliability in pore pressure measurements?
Could someone suggest any articles and/or book about reliability in pore pressure measurements?
I wonder whether tertiary tectonic evolution will give influence to the existence of overpressure in a certain basin or sub-basin? I mean, what kind of tectonic sequence which will be a cause of the existence of overpressure in a basin?
How can we estimate pore pressure in a tight gas reservoir relying on a conventional log suite? Is there any workflow or correlation?
Does anyone have some information about pore pressure prediction directly from seismic impedance ? How I can calculate required parameters for this purpose?
For a pore pressure prediction using Eaton's empirical equation, does anyone actually use Katahara's correction of subtracting the velocity at the mud line (Katahara, 2003)? I have found that term adds too much uncertainty if you want to invert for the exponent n, as per Sayers, 2002.
Pore pressure prediction in tuffaceous formations - which methods should be used there? How one can assess the strength of such formation having only basic set of logs (density, neutron porosity, compressional sonic, resistivity)?
I've have a result of a pore pressure prediction. My question is, how do I validate what I've calculated? Does it has something to do with reservoir pressure or estimated pore pressure from pressure log?
Does anyone have some information about how to measure and estimate the pore pressure in the evaporite layers, particularly Gachsaran formation in the Iranian oil fields?
Has tried Eaton exponent equal to 1.5 or 2 (for PPP from compressional sonic wave velocity)
As you know, there is some methods to find overpressure generation mechanism like using velocity, density, porosity and velocity-effective stress cross plots.
Here is the link result for one of my research on carbonate formation, (I know the complexity of PPP in carbonate). I have used velocity-density cross plot and separate the depth intervals by 100 meters: http://i59.tinypic.com/w7243t.png
The top of overpressure is at 2800 meters. As you see in the picture, the velocity-density cross plot below this depth (2800 m) deviates from the NCT to back at above the normal trend.
Which mechanism do you think cause this deviation? Disequilibrium compaction, unloading, chemical diagenesis, or other?
It has been said that if you "break" Eaton's NCT line (forming a total of two lines), the lines must be parallel to each other. Is there an exception to this rule? If so, what is it based upon?
If there are any references or articles on this, please do not hesitate to mention them.
Hello world.
Word cloud for Things Found Online
Word cloud for Related Reading
EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONTENT IS LICENSED UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 4.0 INTERNATIONAL LICENSE.