Coupling geomechanical modeling with seismic pressure prediction
/Heidari, M., M. A. Nikolinakou, and P. B. Flemings, 2018, Coupling geomechanical modeling with seismic pressure prediction. Geophysics, 83(5), B253-B267. doi: 10.1190/geo2017-0359.1
The following is not original content; these are articles, abstracts, and books I found related to the topics of pore pressure, fracture pressure, geomechanics, wellbore stability, seal capacity, hydrocarbon column height estimates, and rock physics. Please visit the source material in the link provided for more information or content.
The title of these posts are the original titles of the material. The date is the date in which it was published. The category shows the medium of content found. Finally, the tags try to best describe what the material discusses and is searchable in the word cloud on the right.
Applied wellbore stability analysis to Pyrenees development area: A field case
/Araujo, E., A. Lasso, C. Dixon, and T. Perrett, 2018, Applied wellbore stability analysis to Pyrenees development area: A field case. The 52th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium, June 2018, Seattle, Washington, USA. ARMA 18-851, pp. 10.
An integrated in-situ stress measurement program for deepwater Brown Field developments
/Chan, A.W., M. Cuttitta, and G. O’Reilly, 2018, An integrated in-situ stress measurement program for deepwater Brown Field developments. The 52th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium, June 2018, Seattle, Washington, USA. ARMA 18–0171, pp. 8.
Evaluating mechanical damage and closure stress effects on hydraulic fracture treatments using novel geomechanics laboratory testing: Application to Julia Field, Gulf of Mexico
/Crawford, B.R., J.M. Homburg, J.A. Freysteinson, J.D. Amoruso, and C.A. Corbell, 2018, Evaluating mechanical damage and closure stress effects on hydraulic fracture treatments using novel geomechanics laboratory testing: Application to Julia Field, Gulf of Mexico. The 52th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium, June 2018, Seattle, Washington, USA. ARMA-2018-430, pp. 10.
Rock physical controls on production-induced compaction in the Groningen Field
/Hol, S. A. van der Linden, S. Bierman, F. Marcelis, 2018, Rock physical controls on production-induced compaction in the Groningen Field. Scientific Reports, 8(1), p .7156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25455-z
RhoVe Method: A New Empirical Pore Pressure Transform
/Czerniak, M., 2017. RhoVe method: A new empirical pore pressure transform. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 86, 343-366. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.04.019
Pore Pressure Prediction From Well Logs: Methods, Modifications, and New Approaches
/Zhang, J., 2011. Pore pressure prediction from well logs: Methods, modifications, and new approaches. Earth Science Reviews, 108, p. 50 - 63. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.06.001
Unified Model for Continuous Pore Pressure Prediction in Shale
/Vernik, L., 2011. Unified Model for Continuous Pore Pressure Prediction in Shale. The 45th U.S. Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium, June 2011, San Francisco, USA. American Rock Mechanics Association, ARMA 11-444, pp. 6.
Shale Variability in Deep-Marine Depositional Systems: Implications for Seal Character - Subsurface and Outcrop Examples
/Dawson, W.C., Almon, W.R., Dempser, K., and Sutton, S.J., 2008. Shale Variability in Deep-Marine Depositional Systems: Implications for Seal Character - Subsurface and Outcrop Examples. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Search and Discovery Article #50128, pp. 28.
Improving Formation-Strength Tests and Their Interpretation
/van Oort, E. and R. Vargo., 2008. Improving Formation-Strength Tests and Their Interpretation. SPE Drilling & Completion, 23(3), SPE 105193-PA, p. 284 - 294. doi: 10.2118/105193-PA
Analysis of Lost Circulation During Drilling in Cooled Formations
/Hettema, M.H.H., | B. Bostrøm, and | T. Lund, 2004. Analysis of Lost Circulation During Drilling in Cooled Formations. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 26-29 September, Houston, Texas, USA. SPE-90442-MS, pp. 12. doi: 10.2118/90442-MS
Predrill Pore‐Pressure Prediction Using Seismic Data
/Sayers, C. M., G. M. Johnson, and G. Denyer, 2002, Predrill pore‐pressure prediction using seismic data. Geophysics, 67(4), p. 1286-1292. doi: 10.1190/1.1500391
Estimating Mechanical Properties of Shale From Empirical Correlations
/Horsrud, P., 2001. Estimating Mechanical Properties of Shale From Empirical Correlations. SPE Drilling & Completion, 16(2), p. 68 - 73, SPE 56017-PA. doi: 10.2118/56017-PA
In-situ Stress Measurements In Deep Boreholes Using Hydraulic Fracturing, Wellbore Breakouts, And Stonely Wave Polarization
/Zoback, M.D., L. Mastin, and C. Barton, 1986, In-situ stress measurements in deep boreholes using hydraulic fracturing, wellbore breakouts, and stonely wave polarization. International Symposium on Rock Stress Measurements, 1-3 September 1986, Stockholm, Sweden. ISRM-IS-1986-030, p. 289-299.
Capillary Pressures in Stratigraphic Traps
/Berg, R.R., 1975. Capillary Pressures in Stratigraphic Traps. AAPG Bulletin, 59(6), p. 939 - 956. doi: 10.1306/83d91ef7-16c7-11d7-8645000102c1865d
Permeability and Effective Stress
/Zoback, Mark D. and J.D. Byerlee, 1975, Permeability and Effective Stress. AAPG Bulletin, 59(1), p. 154-158. doi: 10.1306/83d91c40-16c7-11d7-8645000102c1865d